Hoping for More Scandal; or, When the “head’s modern, though the trunk’s antique”

Well, as I mentioned yesterday, I had the pleasure of being lectured on sentiment and sensationalism in one of the back rows of The School for Scandal. It was a lesson conveyed with great wit and delivered without frills by the Northern Broadsides theatre company. I didn’t expect Sheridan’s characters to gossip in marked northern accents and thought Maria was less of a prize now that she was shouting just as angrily as the “odious” and “disagreeable” people around her. Generally, however, the coarseness of tongue lent realism to the idle chatter of the upper crust.

Gone was the Cowardian disparity between elocution and vulgarity, between high class and mean instincts. Rather than being vocal acrobats in a Wildean vein, the graduates of this School were crass, brazen, and dangerous mudslingers. Only Joseph Surface was given the slick treatment in voice and appearance, a suitable gloss to reflect his falsehood. What might an American radio production do with such caricatures, I wondered, and went in pursuit of more Scandal on the air.

When aiming at respectability, US radio of the 1930s and 1940s not infrequently availed itself of British drama. Soap operas were for the kitchen—but Shakespeare and Pinero were for the parlor. As I put it in Etherized Victorians, my doctoral study on so-called old-time radio, Sir Benjamin Backbite’s remark about Mrs. Evergreen is an apt comment on US radio drama, a novel form of production that often exhausted itself in re-productions. “[W]hen she has finished her face,” Sir Benjamin quips, the unseen Mrs. Evergreen “joins it on so badly to her neck, that she looks like a mended statue, in which the connoisseur may see at once that the head’s modern, though the trunk’s antique.”

Now, radio drama truly was a “mended statue,” a patched-up artform that rarely resembled the genuine article it tried to copy. In radio, the trunk (the smart console) was modern, but the head, the boardroom of executives in charge of programming, was decidedly “antique” when it came to defining wholesome or commercially viable entertainment. To be sure, in the case of Pre-Victorian plays like Sheridan’s Scandal, mending the statue might have required some whitewash to tone down its display of adultery and cover up its hints of abortion.

Unfortunately, the productions of Scandal as heard on the Radio Guild are no longer extant, since no transcription have been preserved or recovered. Indeed, nearly the entire series seems to have been destroyed as scandalously as the reputation of Sheridan’s characters. This is all the more lamentable considering that the Radio Guild (pictured above, anno 1930) was the first major theater anthology on network radio. Beginning in 1929, just days after Wall Street laid its infamous egg, it brought free theater into the homes of millions, plays ranging from Shakespeare to Wilde, from Goldsmith to Boucicault.

Even if its producers kept their heads mainly in antique trunks, Radio Guild surely sounds like a statue worth mending, if only its pieces had been scattered rather than obliterated. So, if you find a fragment, please fling it my way.

2 Replies to “Hoping for More Scandal; or, When the “head’s modern, though the trunk’s antique””

  1. I believe altogether I have four different episodes of the Radio Guild on cassette:The Man Who Was Tomorrow (one of the all-time masterpieces of radio, in my opinion)The Ineffible Essence of NothingThe Shrinking Mr. PertweeThe Towers Of Hatred (with a strong anti-fascist message)All my tapes are packed away in boxes and I haven\’t listened to these in ages.

    Like

  2. I did come across one other Radio Guild play called \”Back Number Up.\” These are the shows from the end of the Guild\’s run (1939/40), which bears little resemblance to the original hourlong theater format. Instead (and perhaps not unwisely), the Guild was turned into something akin to the Columbia Workshop and Author\’s Playhouse. Meanwhile, I don\’t have the recordings you mention. Since Ranald MacDougall is one of the more interesting American radio playwrights, I\’d sure appreciate an earful of \”Ineffable\” or \”The Man.\” Time to unwrap those boxes!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s