Lost Issue: US Television, Elsewhere

A really old issue of Radio Times

Yesterday, at the local supermarket, a line on the cover of Radio Times caught my eye: “The new Desperate Housewives is here!” Since Housewives was the last—come to think of it, the only—dramatic series I had been following since moving here to Britain from the US, I was sufficiently intrigued to do a double-take. Yes, that’s what it said. Then I scratched my head in momentary puzzlement: A new season already, I thought, how could that be? As it turns out (and I tend to read carelessly at times) the line referred to the series Lost, which is being touted, somewhat misleadingly, as the newest US ratings champ in search of a British audience.

Lost, indeed! That show had its US premiere in September 2004. What took Channel 4 so long to land it? This might have meant smooth sailing in the days of Gilligan’s Island; but in an age of online piracy and file sharing, when motion pictures are tossed into the market in near-global simultaneity to counter ticket sales erosion, eleven months at sea seems a dangerously prolonged journey. It’s already been regurgitated on the web and neatly logged for me over at TV.com. So, why hop aboard now?

I grew up with second-hand culture. A TV-crazed kid in my native Germany, I very rarely watched any locally produced programs. Cartoons aside, my earliest memories include watching Hoppla Lucy (Here’s Lucy), Familie Feuerstein (The Flintstones), Lieber Onkel Bill (Family Affair) Die Bezaubernde Jeannie (I Dream of Jeannie), Raumschiff Enterprise (Star Trek), and, somewhat later, Drei Jungen und drei Mädchen (The Brady Bunch). All shows were dubbed, of course, but the production values—the home of the Bradys alone—told me that these shows had not been thrown together in my backyard. Although the Bradys were notoriously unfashionable, I took these hand-me-downs gladly.

That didn’t change much during the shoulder-pads decade, when Alexis Carrington Colby Dexter vamped herself to the top of the ratings in Denver Clan (as Dynasty was known in Germany). What did change was that I began to realize I was looking at preserved goods not quite as fresh as they were advertised to me (no, I’m not talking Joan Collins here). The tabloids were already giving away plot developments and cast changes for the months to come and what was left for me to do was to speculate just how the convoluted storylines would end up where I knew they would eventually go.

Melodrama thrives on foreshadowing and you-know-it’s-coming signposting; but these inside scoops were no markers woven into the fabric of the plot. It was almost like watching Psycho after reading Truffaut’s seminal Hitchcock interview—it was impossible for me really to see it for the first time. The experience was second-hand and I was almost forced to be distant and analytic in my reading, rather than engrossed. The feeling that I was untouched by something millions elsewhere had reveled in began to irk me.

Watching US television in the US, I experienced a sense of sharing, of participating in broadcasting events as they were unfolded to the public, even though the fictions I followed were no longer televised live. Now, I once again get the impression that I’m being dealt seconds. Pouting, I decided that, next week, when Lost comes along I’m not going to stand on the pier to watch this inaugural-seasoned vessel dock or sink.

So, when I got home from the market, I put aside the Radio Times, picked up a DVD, and settled down to watch The Shanghai Cobra from my Charlie Chan collection. Old hat and third rate, to be sure, but at least it wasn’t peddled to me as dernier cri.

Listening Away; or, Sound and Soli[ci]tude

Well, I missed Live 8 this weekend; or it went right past me, rather. These days, I seem to be catching up with the world instead of living in it. Visual reminders of the present are all around me; but they flicker in a sphere of some remove, while the sounds of the past, close up and intimate, continue to envelop and move me. The world of today often appears to be a realm apart, not an actuality that envelops me. Even if it calls out to me, I can rarely be reached for comment.

Does Kate Smith still ring a bell?

So, the spectacle of Live 8 has passed me by. Of course, mass-mediated fund-raising efforts and public appeals are nothing new; they certainly precede television. There was Kate Smith, for instance, who raised millions for defense on US radio during the war loan drives of the 1940s. US programs like the Treasury Star Parade produced plays and staged musical numbers expressly for that purpose.

Not long after VJ Day, public service announcements encouraged listeners to assist financially in the rebuilding of Europe, to give to civilians who, not too long ago, were to be thought of, if at all, as adversaries and extensions of enemy forces.

War and peace propaganda aside, radio audiences were often urged to contribute to their communities and be socially responsible; they were reminded that careful listening meant responding and interacting, even though the actions to be taken were dictated to them.

Undoubtedly, Live 8 is creating the greatest gathering of individuals being sold on a latter-day Borrioboola Gha—a distant, indistinct mass of people unified in hunger and deserving of charity, provided the image of “Africa,” its local needs and multiple identities can be commodified, packaged and transmitted globally as a relatable tune.

I can recall the Band Aid efforts of 1985. Excited as I was by the idea of becoming part of a transnational musical bloc party, I never thought much about the cause behind it nor made any contribution other than showing up for it at an open-air concert in Cologne, Germany.

Today, making a spontaneous, one-time donation is as easy as pressing a button on your mobile phone; but can the incongruous, televised images of musical entertainers and starving children assist in making complex geopolitical situations, post-colonial legacies and neo-Imperialism more transparent, or even in making millions elsewhere matter at home?

Can an image truly say more than a thousand bytes of sound? Presumably, the fleeting utterances airwaved on live radio appeal to the emotion more than print or visual media, which encourage closer scrutiny and permit re-examination—the remove of reason.  Radio, it has been argued by Marshall McLuhan and his followers, is a fascist medium. It is the fabled tribal drum, a sonic leveler—enchanting, reverberating and hammering home.

Indeed, the aural medium strikes me as a more immediate, more readily suggestive propagandistic tool than other mass media. Sure, television or computer screens, too, can reach the multitude-as-individuals with whatever messages they are employed to convey; but the eye, opening up a world, also keeps it at a distance. We look on, stare or gawk at something other than and outside of ourselves; even our own image, once televised or screened, becomes strange to us.

Unlike the eye, my ear brings the world home, making even the infinite seem intimate. Whatever “eager droppings” spill over the “porches of my ear” melt into me, become me. I take sound in, am taken in, and, thus taken, am carried away—by force and by choice—from the image empire of today. I am listening, away.

[Last revised 25 January 2025]