“Mike”; for the Love of It

“What is there to say about what one loves except: I love it, and to keep on saying it?” Roland Barthes famously remarked. Sometimes, getting to the stage of saying even that much requires quite a bit of effort; and sometimes you donโ€™t get to say it at all. Love may be where you find it, but it may also be the very act of discovery. The objective rather than the object. The pursuit whose outcome is uncertain. Methodical, systematic, diligent. Sure, research, if it is to bear fruit, should be all that. And yet, it is also a labor of love. It can be ill timed and unappreciated. If nothing comes of it, you might call it unrequited. It may be all-consuming, impolitic and quixotic. Still, itโ€™s a quest. Itโ€™s passion, for the love of Mike!

โ€œMikeโ€ has been given me a tough time. It all began as a wildly improbable romance acted out by my favorite leading lady. It was nearly a decade ago, in the late spring of 2001, that I first encountered the name. โ€œMikeโ€ is a reference in the opening credits of the film Torch Singer, a 1933 melodrama starring Claudette Colbert. Having long been an admirer of Ms. Colbertโ€”who, incidentally made her screen debut in the 1927 comedy For the Love of Mike, a silent film now lostโ€”I was anxious to catch up with another one of her lesser-known efforts when it was screened at New York Cityโ€™s Film Forum, an art house cinema I love for its retrospectives of classicโ€”and not quite so classicโ€”Hollywood fare.

Until its release on DVD in 2009, Alexander Hallโ€™s Torch Singer was pretty much a forgotten film, one of those fascinatingly irregular products of the Pre-Code era, films that strike us, in the Code-mindedness with which we are conditioned to approach old movies, as being about as incongruous, discomfiting and politically incorrect as a blackface routine at a Nelson Mandela tribute or a pecan pie eating contest at a Weight Watchers meeting. Many of these talkies, shot between 1929 and 1934, survive only in heavily censored copies, at times re-cut and refitted with what we now understand to be traditional Hollywood endings.

Torch Singer, which tells the Depression era story of a fallen woman who takes over a childrenโ€™s program and, through it, reestablishes contact with the illegitimate daughter she could not support without falling, has, apart from its scandalous subject matter, such an irresistible radio angle that I was anxious to discuss it in Etherized Victorians, the dissertation on American radio drama I was then in the process of researching.

Intent on presenting radio drama as a literary rather than historical or pop-cultural subject, I was particularly interested in published scripts, articles by noted writers with a past in broadcasting, and fictions documenting the central role the โ€œEnormous Radioโ€ played in American culture during the 1920s, โ€˜30s, and โ€˜40s. I thought about dedicating a chapter of my study to stories in which studios serve as settings, microphones feature as characters, and broadcasts are integral to the plot.

Torch Singer is just such a storyโ€”and, as the opening credits told me, one with a past in print. Written by Lenore Coffee and Lynn Starling, the screenplay is based on the story โ€œMikeโ€ by Grace Perkins; but that was all I had to go on when I began my search. No publisher, no date, no clues at all about the print source in which โ€œMikeโ€ first came before the public.


Little could be gleaned from Perkinsโ€™s New York Times obituaryโ€”somewhat overshadowed by the announcement of the death of Enrico Carusoโ€™s wife Dorothyโ€”other than that she died not long after assisting Madame Chiang Kai-shek in writing The Sure Victory (1955); that she had married Fulton Oursler, senior editor of Readerโ€™s Digest and author of the radio serial The Greatest Story Ever Told; and that she had penned a number of novels published serially in popular magazines of the 1930s. That sure complicated matters as I went on to turn the yellowed pages of many once popular journals of the period in hopes of coming across the elusive โ€œMike.โ€

Finally, years after my degree was in the bagโ€”and what a deep receptacle that turned out to beโ€”I found โ€œMikeโ€ between the pages of the 20 May 1933 issue of Liberty; or the better half of โ€œMike,โ€ at least, as this is a serialized narrative. Never mind; I am not that interested anyway in the storyโ€™s other Mike, the man who deserted our heroine and with whom she is reunited in the end. At last, I got my hands on this โ€œRevealing Story of a Radio Starโ€™s Romance,โ€ the story of the โ€œnotorious Mimi Benton,โ€ a hard-drinking mantrap whoโ€™d likely โ€œend up in the gutter,โ€ but went on the air insteadโ€”and โ€œright into your homes! Yes, sir, and talked to your children time and time again!โ€

โ€œMike,โ€ like Torch Singer, is a fiction that speaks to Depression-weary Americans who, dependent on handouts, bereft of status and influence, came to realizeโ€”and romanticizeโ€”what else they lost in the Roaring Twenties when the wireless, initially a means of point-to-point communication, became a medium that, as I put it in my dissertation,

not merely controlled but prevented discourse. Instead of interacting with one another, Depression-era Americans were just sitting around in the parlor, John Dos Passos observed, โ€œlistening drowsily to disconnected voices, stale scraps of last yearโ€™s jazz, unfinished litanies advertising unnamed products that dribble senselessly from the radio,โ€ only to become receptive to President Rooseveltโ€™s deceptively communal โ€œyouandmeโ€ from the fireside.

Rather than โ€œlistening drowsily,โ€ disenfranchised Mimi Benton, anathema to corporate sponsors, reclaims the medium by claiming the microphone for her own quest and, with it, seizes the opportunity to restore an intimate bond that society forced her to sever. These days, Mimi Benton would probably start a campaign on Facebook or blog her heart outโ€”unless she chose to lose herself in virtual realities or clutch a Tamagotchi, giving up a quest in which the medium can only be a means, not an end.


Related writings
โ€œRadio at the Movies: Torch Singer (1933)โ€
โ€œRadio at the Movies: Manslaughter (1922)โ€

Radio at the Movies: Torch Singer (1933)

โ€œYoo-hoo, is anybody?โ€ I guess that, from time to time, many of us amateur journalists feel compelled to ask the question so catchily phrased by the matriarch of the Goldbergs. At least Molly Goldberg could hope for a response from her friend and neighbor Mrs. Bloom, to whom her shouts into the dumb waiter shaft were directed. To Mrs. Goldberg, โ€œanybodyโ€ was a certain someone. Many who approached the World Wide Web as their means of telecommuning have given up on waiting for a reply to their โ€œYoo-hoos,โ€ or, instead, have taken the resounding silence for an answer equivalent to โ€œnope.โ€

According to a 2008 survey conducted by Technorati (which, earlier this month, was referred to in a New York Times article on the blogging phenomenon), 95 percent of all online journals have been essentially abandoned. Tens of millions who saw blogging as an opportunity to cast their thoughts broadly and make their voices heard by the multitudes decided that, once this vast crowd of followers did not, well, immaterialize, their words were wasted on the one or another for whose arrival they would not be dumb enough to wait and to whose apparently exclusive tastes they would not lower themselves to cater.

Like broadcasting before it, the blogosphere lures those creative spirits who might otherwise be dispirited nobodies with that one-in-a-million chance at fame while its ability to connect us to the one-in-a-million willing to connect with us frequently goes unappreciated. As public performers, we wonโ€™t settle for โ€œanybodyโ€โ€”but we seem more inclined to aim at the elusive everyone than the dependable someone. One of the most intriguing motion pictures to address our narrow-mindedness about broadcasting is the Depression-era melodrama Torch Singer (1933), one of those startlingly unconventional, non-classic Hollywood pictures referred to as Pre-Code.

Torch Singer stars Claudette Colbert as an unwed mother (that is Pre-Code for you) who, failing to find employment, is forced to give up her infant daughter. After that intimate bond is severed, the motherless child of a childless mother avenges herself on an impersonal, dehumanizing society by tantalizing those who made her suffer, selling the mere appeal of sex to the highest bidder. โ€œGive Me Liberty or Give Me Love,โ€ she warbles, achieving neither. Her body having been robbed of its fruit and the warmth of nestling, she turns her voice into a commodity, first by making a(nother) name for herself a nightclub singer, then by accepting the offer to become a disembodied siren on the radio.

When a newly hired storyteller for a childrenโ€™s program is struck dumb with mike fright, the reckless Torch Singer takes over as the fictitious โ€œAunt Jenny,โ€ comforter by proxy, singing lullabies so far removed from any cradle that they are devoid of sincerity, all the while tickled by her own moxie as she promotes the sponsorโ€™s kiddie beverage, long drink in hand.

This perversion of motherhood comes to an end when she realizes that it is possible to subvert the medium instead and seize the microphone to reach the child she gave up for adoption. Rather than performing for everyone and no one, she now sings directly to her daughter, devising a contest that would compel radio listening kids to call in and claim their birthday surprises, thereby revealing their identity to her. Once taken into her own hands, the very medium that seemed to have promised nothing but the belated fame for which she never cared becomes the means through which she can reestablish the intimacy she long believed to be past recapturing.

Its melodramatic shortcomings notwithstanding, Torch Singer serves as a compelling reminder that the media, as extensions or offshoots of telecommunication, have not lostโ€”and should never be divested ofโ€”their potential to establish point-to-point connections far more meaningful than the often disappointing stabs at mass exposure in which we are apt to lose sight of one another.

Related writings
โ€œBetween You, Molly and Me: Should We Settle for Squirrels?โ€
โ€œWireless Women, Clueless Men (Part Five): Gertrude Berg, Everybody’s Mamaโ€