“For twelve years, our nation was afflicted with ‘see nothing, hear nothing, do nothing’ government.” That is what President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared in a campaign speech at New York City’s Madison Square Garden on this day, Halloween, in 1936. Make that “eight years,” and a presidential nominee could give the speech today. Count the previous Bush administration and you got those twelve years, an era that the majority of those polled—and the majority of those looking on beyond US borders—are anxious to consider bygone next January.
“The nation looked to that government, but that government looked away,” FDR continued. It had been “nine crazy years at the ticker and three long years in the breadline. Nine mad years of mirage and three long years of despair.” Checking that Wall Street ticker lately, I have come to suspect that those years of despair and breadlines may well lie ahead. They will be a test for the candidate who succeeds next Tuesday.
FDR, who had pulled America out of that crisis, warned that “powerful influences” were “trying to restore that kind of government with its doctrine that that government is best which is most indifferent to mankind.” That, to me, sums up Republican politics, the kind of politics that count on the voters’ lowest impulse, individual greed, to sell its idea of carrying on at the expense of all else, be it nature or the future of mankind.
“For four years now,” FDR reminded his listeners,
you have had an administration, which instead of twirling its thumbs, has rolled up its sleeves. And I assure you that we keep our sleeves rolled up. We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace, business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering. They had begun to consider the government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs; and we know now that government by organized money is just as dangerous as government by organized mob.
Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me, and I welcome their hatred.
I am sure that many Republicans fear nothing more tonight than the impending end of politics as usual; and they have as good a reason to be afraid as do those who dread the prospect of having to endure such politics for another four, devastating years. Whatever your mask or affiliations, this is the night to be scared together. Happy Halloween!
Harry Heuser 
It\’s funny, of all the people I know, my Republican friends are the most selfish and ignorant, I have to say it. The Democrats are all really nice, caring people with decent family values and the desire to serve other people.
LikeLike
Never mind \”Republican\” or \”Democrat.\” Find new friends, or another definition of the term.
LikeLike
Funny Barry is as \”politics and big government\” as they come. As for the commenter above stating that Republicans are \”ignorant\” and \”selfish\” LOL. Here\’s the stats:1) Dem\’s are \”change\”; Corporate America-Companies ShiftMore DonationsTo Democratshttp://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB117790069010286617-Xz4XikFqFlSwWSokkpgptCULmoo_20080428.html2)Republicans give a bigger share of their incomes to charity, says a prominent economist.http://philanthropy.com/free/articles/v19/i04/04001101.htmNow, I\’m a Republican, I am an avid environmentalist, raise thousands a year for the ASPCA and volunteer at a local wildlife preserve. Oh but according to you all Republicans are cheap mean and evil. Nice.
LikeLike
I won\’t stoop to \”cheap mean and evil.\”
LikeLike
I think the problem is this: if the GOP is \”most indifferent to mankind,\” then the Dems are only \”slightly less indifferent to mankind.\” But both are in the pay of the \”Corporate America\” mentioned above. The concern of both is profits over people, one way or another. To the extent that the extremism of the Republicans has threatened profits, the corporations will back the Democrats. (And they have: during the primary season, the Dems raised more money than the GOP and, at one point Obama was raising more than all the other candidates combined, GOP and Dem). Nine times out of ten, the American candidate who raises the most money wins.The rise of Obama reminds me of the coming of the conqueror in \”The Fall of the City\” where an empty suit is preceded by a lot of propaganda that stokes fear or submission or idolatry. If America was genuinely ready for public policy that wasn\’t indifferent to its citizens, they\’d be voting for a radical, not a mainstream liberal like Obama or a reactionary hawk like McCain, both of whom are the choices of the rich and powerful.
LikeLike
Thank you for commenting.I\’m not sure whether you know, since you are posting anonymously, but I have discussed MacLeish\’s plays previously:http://blog.harryheuser.com/2005/09/on-this-day-in-1066-and-1939-two.htmlWhat do you make of FDR?
LikeLike